The Perils of Anti-Racism

ukip-rotherham-poster

I wrote “Yes, the West is Comparatively Racism-Free” for Dissident Voice.

The Dissident Voice website usually publishes my articles, after subjecting them to accurate, and welcome, editorial criticism. On this occasion, they demurred. This article attempts to reinforce my argument, which Dissident Voice rejected. In a nutshell:

We – in Canada, Britain, the USA, etc. – live in among the least racially prejudiced societies known. We are anti-racist to a fault.

I gave several examples. Recently, another, horrifying example of the excesses of political correctness has emerged in the UK. Hundreds of children have been sexually abused by Asian men for years. These men also trafficked girls to other Muslims, threatening to set them on fire if they reported the abuse.

It’s not just in the right-wing tabloids, such as the Daily Mail. The liberal media, the BBC and the Guardian, have also reported that fear of being accused of racism has hindered the investigation of rape and prostitution of girls as young as eleven.

I don’t expect the reader to take my word, or even that of the Guardian, for it. Download the report, by professor Alexis Jay for Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council:

http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham

By far the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by victims.

She also reported in 2006 that young people in Rotherham believed at that time that the Police dared not act against Asian youths for fear of allegations of racism.

Muslims don’t just exploit white girls.

It’s worth noting that

The Deputy Children’s Commissioner’s report reached a similar conclusion to the Muslim Women’s Network research, stating ‘one of these myths was that only white girls are victims of sexual exploitation by Asian or Muslim males, as if these men only abuse outside of their own community, driven by hatred and contempt for white females’.

In other words, Asian gangs exploit Asian girls as well as white ones.

My point is simply that fear of being accused of racism paralyzed the response of the authorities to child rape by primarily Asian men.

Therefore, if you want to protect children, you need to resist the effects of anti-racism.

By the way, this report is about Rotherham, a borough of around 250,000 people. Similar things have happened in other deprived Northern towns. It’s probably the tip of an iceberg.

PS. Six months before the Jay report, a right-wing think-tank issued its own, even more detailed, well-referenced, and shocking investigation of Muslim child rape gangs. It also goes a lot further into the argument that anti-racism was one of the main reasons for the failure of the authorities to stop the abuse. It goes as far as to say that organizations like Unite Against Fascism helped perpetuate the rape and exploitation of schoolgirls by Muslims, by successfully pressurizing a television channel to withdraw a documentary about it (page 208).

http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/2014/03/04/comprehensive-report-on-the-grooming-gangs/

PPS. From less than a year ago: Unite Against Fascism organized a protest to “defend multicultural Rotherham”: http://alt-sheff.org/events/2345/print/

Contrasting media reactions to massacres in South Africa and Gaza

soweto

After the Soweto massacre

The Guardian view on Soweto and the rise of anti whiteism

Of course, it wasn’t like that. In 1976, the Guardian and the rest of the Western press didn’t worry that the massacre of black schoolchildren in Soweto, South Africa, by the police, supported by a large section of the white population, would result in hostility to white people.

The Guardian view on Gaza and the rise of antisemitism

But today, when Jews are doing pretty much the same thing, the Guardian is worried that people might not like them.

Attacks on synagogues, Jewish shops and individuals – even children – are rising. They are inexcusable.

This article whines about “antisemitism” in Europe, amalgamating the Toulouse killings by a lone demented Muslim two years ago, with protests against Israel today, and claiming that French people defending themselves against the JDL are “racist”. Yet the article contains an admission:

Yes, Jews feel bound up with Israel, they believe in its right to survive and thrive. But that does not mean they should be held responsible for its policy…

Firstly, not all Jews believe in Israel’s right to “survive and thrive”. Secondly, those that do are responsible — not for its “policy” — it’s not a question of policy. Israel doesn’t do ethnic cleansing — Israel is ethnic cleansing.

Israeli Jews murder hundreds of people, including many children, and Jews around the world support them. Naturally, there is hostility toward these murderers and their supporters. The media is at least as concerned with the reaction, which it labels “antisemitism”, as it is with the cause. The liberal veneer comes off — the Guardian and most of the rest of the media subordinates itself to Jewish interests.

gaza-child

A lucky child who survived the Gaza massacre

PS. The Guardian editorial is a watered-down version of an article the previous day by Jon Henley – “worst times since the Nazis”: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/07/antisemitism-rise-europe-worst-since-nazis

PPS. Another example of concern about antisemitism, from Valerie Tarico on Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/valerie-tarico/sophisticated-liberal-jew_b_191135.html

Israel has violated international law and may well be guilty of war crimes.

but

I get so overwhelmed by the flood of thinly veiled Jew-loathing that I can’t respond to anything else.

Hopefully, this means she’ll shut the fuck up.

PPPS. Finally, here’s p.c. leftist Richard Seymour, also getting his knickers in a twist about “antisemitism” in Europe: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/08/the-anti-zionism-of-fools/